This year’s PeopleFront focused on three main pillars of the
media marketplace – people, outcomes and ROI – and offered discussion
viewpoints from “the street”, the research, the data and the buyers and sellers.
Dave Morgan, CEO and founder of Simulmedia and the host of
the PeopleFront, presented the big picture when he said, “There is a consensus
that the next year or two will bring significant change. TV is continuing to make money and is
expected to make money for some time. There are steps that TV companies can do
to extend the duration and profitability.”
Here are the different views on possible solutions:
View from the Street
Change, consumer behavior evolution and the limitations of
the measurement in a world of ever increasing pools of data cause a confluence
of challenges. “The nature of what is TV is fluid,” noted Brian Weiser, Senior
Analyst, Pivotal, “Younger demos change behavior more rapidly. Some behavior is
not currently measured that would make consumption data more healthy.” He
explained that there was a recent CRE insights study that showed that TV is
ambient in a world of multi-tasking. “There is still an important role for TV,”
he assured, “but it is changing” depending on the degree of programming
engagement.
On the ad side of the equation, Anthony DiClemente, Managing
Director, Nomera, said, “The U.S. ad growth is robust and we have upped our forecast.
TV is showing unexpected resilience.” That is this season. The projection may
change in two or three years as Anthony admitted, “Automation of TV ad selling is
causing concern.”
Affiliate fees are an area of current concern, however. There
are persistent concerns regarding cord cutting and shaving and the further consolidation
in the distribution space. “We are shifting to larger and more scaled companies,’
said Anthony, “What is media doing with their cash? Are they investing
organically? Are they automating? Or are they buying stock back? We applaud
companies organically and investing in the right way such as in infrastructure,
programming etc.”
What the Research
Says
The ARF recently completed an ambitious series of studies to measure how advertising works. "We collected 40 industry leaders together, committed $1million investment on three studies over 5000 campaigns, twelve years of data, $375B in advertising spend in 41 countries across over 100 categories in the areas of Cross platform ROI, improve creative and mobile mastery," explained ARF CEO Gayle Fuguitt. The insights were that advertisers need to invest across platforms, combine traditional and digital media, optimize digital by capping frequency and unify their creative while keeping in mind the unique characteristics of each platform to optimize performance.
The ARF recently completed an ambitious series of studies to measure how advertising works. "We collected 40 industry leaders together, committed $1million investment on three studies over 5000 campaigns, twelve years of data, $375B in advertising spend in 41 countries across over 100 categories in the areas of Cross platform ROI, improve creative and mobile mastery," explained ARF CEO Gayle Fuguitt. The insights were that advertisers need to invest across platforms, combine traditional and digital media, optimize digital by capping frequency and unify their creative while keeping in mind the unique characteristics of each platform to optimize performance.
“Targeting purchasers by direct match at scale increases ROI,”
explained Bill Harvey, Co-Founder and Strategic Advisor, TiVo Research. “TiVo
Research proved it with multiple advertisers. Now Simulmedia is proving it by
running 72 campaigns for advertisers in 2015 using the same methods and showing
ROI improvements in the same range as TiVo i.e. up to +250%. Simulmedia is also
reducing waste frequency and is targeting day of week for recency. An example
of a campaign where the same brand’s other TV had half the impressions in the
excessive frequency range, the Simulmedia campaign had fewer than 5% in that
bucket,” he concluded.
Daniel Slotwiner, Director Advertising Research at Facebook,
recently conducted a study with Neuro-Insight on the coordination of TV
advertising with digital to get the best impact. “We measured memorability,
brand linkage, likability linkage and found the most efficient way to drive
awareness.”
Connecting the Dots with Data
There is
more data available than ever before and research companies are actively engaged
in creating tools to maximize the value of this data. But there are challenges.
In the case of Nielsen, Steve Hasker, President and COO explained that, “We
have been working with STB data for 7 years, matching it up with credit card
data and working on an independent currency measurement using the panel with
large databases.” But it has not been easy. “We are chipping away to get access
to STB data,” he added, “Most of today's STB data owners can't supply STB data
over night.”
Omar
Tawakoi, SVP, GM Oracle Data Cloud, said, “We are running a data cloud. Having
a census approach is very important. In digital everything is census based and
things are starting to get really interesting in TV. We are connecting offline
sales to digital activities and want to prove that TV ads drive sales offline.”
“My clients
only care if we moved the needle,” said Wes Nichols, Co-Founder, Marketshare,
SVP Chief Strategy Officer. “They really don't care about measurement or the brilliance
of a campaign etc. There is a huge credibility gap between marketing and the C-suite.
We are cobbling together data based measurement and need to get a fuller
assessment of our investment.”
Buyers and Sellers of the Eve of the
Upfront
What about
content providers and buyers? From the sellers side, Arlene Manos, President
national Ad Sales, AMC, said, “Data has begun to figure into our discussion.
But as a single company, we can’t effect change alone. We are using data to
change internally and to figure out how to get viewers acquainted with our
diverse programming.”
On the
buyers side, Yin Woon Rani, VP, U.S. Marketing at Campbell’s, noted that,
“Traditional advertisers take a TV centric viewpoint. But digital is changing the nature of
expectations. It is not that easy to compare between mediums so the real task for
marketers is deciding where dollars can go across the media pool.”
But, there has been “an evolution over several years. We are
getting more find tuned beyond demographics,” according to M’lou Walker, CEO,
Matrixx. Because Matrixx in is the consumer healthcare industry, M’lou said that
“Knowing when our consumers are sick is more important for us. We need to find
who she is at that moment of illness. So we take segmentation data and find
consumers at different points and roll it all up. TV plus digital gets us much further. We can get
to consumer in her moment.”
As Dave concluded, the industry is now “More evolutionary
than revolutionary but the evolutionary pace is picking up. We are swimming in
data. How to can we best operationalize it?” That will remain the burning
question as we are about to enter the next upfront.
This article first appeared in www.MediaBizBlogger.com
This article first appeared in www.MediaBizBlogger.com
No comments:
Post a Comment