Turner has recently released the results of their new VOD study which proves,
through Nielsen VOD Content Ratings, that VOD programming attracts a more
desirable and highly engaged audience over the span of time. This should not come
as a surprise – when people can choose the optimal time to view their content,
they pay more attention.
As a recent press release noted, Turner has been “aggressively experimenting with content strategies and ad formats that focus on mutual benefits for viewers and advertising partners.” Increasingly, they are focusing on measurement to evaluate these strategies.
As a recent press release noted, Turner has been “aggressively experimenting with content strategies and ad formats that focus on mutual benefits for viewers and advertising partners.” Increasingly, they are focusing on measurement to evaluate these strategies.
Turner’s work with Nielsen resulted in
a case study on the program Good Behavior,
which examined how
Cable VOD compared to other TV set +
set-top box viewing methods (live TV and DVR). In Good Behavior, VOD was the preferred viewing platform, driving
viewing beyond the 3-day window. The percentage of total viewers from VOD grew
from 5% at 3 days to almost 50% after 90 days.
This research study comes at a pivotal
time. Cross-screen inventory (including VOD) will be offered as part of
Turner’s OpenAP inventory by the end of this year.
I sat down with Sandy Padula, SVP
Research, TBS-TNT Research and Consumer Insight, to get the details:
Charlene Weisler: How did the idea to do this study start?
Sandy Padula: A few years ago, I
started noticing that we had a significant amount of viewing for our original
series happening in the VOD space beyond the seven day window. I also heard
this from other networks in the industry. When we started looking specifically
at this issue with our new content - and our historical content as we deepened
our library - we were seeing that upwards of half of the viewing for original
series was occurring in VOD 8 day plus. It was not only substantial audience,
but also very desirable. They were younger, more affluent and they looked like
the DVR audience. They were also more engaged and were watching more of the
episodes. We learned that as the C7 ratings continued to decline, our current
measurement offered less and less of a good picture of the total viewership that
was happening.
Weisler: I see rating was used as one of the metrics. What other
metrics did you use to measure?
Padula: Engagement is also an
important metric. We see that the completion rate and time spent viewing in VOD
is really high - Higher than in c3 and c7. We are looking for more
opportunities to test and learn with advertisers on engagement. In the couple
of studies that we have done, we have seen that recall of advertisers in the
pod and the affinity of the advertisers in the pod, increase when viewed in VOD.
Weisler: How did the results look for other programming genres?
Padula: What we found for Good Behavior was also true for other
programming genres across the board. The exception was for genres like live
events or news and sometimes topical late night where VOD doesn’t really factor
as much. But generally speaking, show to show to show, our VOD audiences are
more desirable, more affluent and the consumption across all of our VOD is
growing substantially. Both TBS and TNT
VOD had record performances last year because the depth of our library is important
and growing, and the consumption of VOD is increasing.
Weisler: What are your next steps in examining VOD?
Padula: I am hoping that we will get
to a point where our advertisers and are partners understand that we can
forecast on video content ratings the same way we can post ratings in linear. We
are getting impressions from ad servers like Canoe and Freewheel and are
getting demographics from Nielsen. We are able to post and forecast the same
way we do in linear. Two years ago we had a less complete picture of linear
viewing and two years from now it will be even less complete. We are seeing our
consumers watch our shows later and later from the original air date. Our deep
library is also becoming more important. So much so that we are seeing our VOD
more like SVOD. It is giving viewers more choice that is related to our
network.
Weisler: What has the reaction been from agencies and advertisers?
Padula: We have had positive feedback
from advertisers in the VOD space because they know that the audience is
younger and more engaged. It is a better viewing experience for the fans. And
the advertiser / advertising experience is better too. We’ve had good sell-out
with our available VOD inventory. We are increasing our DAI and are now in 60
million homes.
Weisler: What do you see as the impact of VOD in the future?
Padula: We will have more impressions
to sell. The whole concept of VOD is fascinating and it is low hanging fruit
for the industry. It is where people are making a choice to view content on
their own time. The amount of original content we are creating on TBS and TNT
and putting into our library is driving a lot of viewing to our shows that we
just weren’t capturing before. We have the ability to stack our shows and give
people the ability to watch more and more episodes and bringing them into the
VOD space which can introduce them to more of our content. It is valuable to
the advertiser and is what the consumer is looking for.
This article first appeared in www.MediaVillage.com
This article first appeared in www.MediaVillage.com
No comments:
Post a Comment