Showing posts with label Netflix. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Netflix. Show all posts

Nov 1, 2018

Looking Back and Moving Forward. Interview with Howard Shimmel of Janus Strategy and Insights



Image result for howard shimmelAnother research veteran is striking out on his own after an illustrious media career. Howard Shimmel, previously of MTV, Nielsen, AOL and most recently Turner, has formed his own consultancy, Janus Strategy and Insights.  Why that name? “Janus is a Roman God who looks to the future,” Shimmel explained, “but he does so that in a way that he can also keep a close eye on the past.” 

Merging the lessons of the past with strategies for the future is a good way to leverage Shimmel’s expertise to, as he stated, “to help the market move in a better direction and help emerging data research companies become bigger and more scalable.”

Charlene Weisler: What are the biggest challenges that media companies face today?

Howard Shimmel: Media companies are challenged with having to grow ratings, growing subscribers, fend off new competition such as Netflix, Amazon and Apple and grappling with consumer choice where the cable box is not necessarily the first choice for viewers. Now they can turn on their Roku device, they can go to their smart TV app menu on their TV. So the first challenge is how do media companies migrate to a new reality which could not be more different from the reality we spent most of our careers living in. On the emerging research company data side, it is figuring a way that they can come to market and position their product in a way that fits within the existing work streams of a media company, how is what they can provide additive to what the company is doing now as well as the net benefits. 

Charlene Weisler: Data management is pivotal. What have you learned regarding the best practices in managing all of the available data?

Howard Shimmel: A mistake that I think we make in the industry is that we tend to take the tools that we have always been using – Nielsen, MRI, Scarborough, Simmons, comScore – and put them in a very different bucket than the first, second and third party, digital, OTT and virtual MVPD datasets that we are now receiving. Companies need to think about a holistic data strategy where they are using each of those assets for its right use case and also finding ways to leverage across those assets. When you think about it, a network has great first party consumption data from their network apps. But all they are seeing is a very limited view of consumption. What they need the ability to do is find a way through data modeling or data appends to model linear consumption on top of the first party data, that which makes all of the applications they are looking to do with their over the top apps more powerful. So there is the issue of the siloing of datasets that need to be integrated and then there is the real day-to-day issue of how to leverage all of this data to better execute strategies.

Charlene Weisler: How far away do you think we are from a cross-platform measurement solution?

Howard Shimmel: If we think about our career arcs, there have been times when we’ve had great partnership relationships with measurement companies such as Nielsen and comScore, we’ve challenged them when they’ve needed to be challenged. One thing I think the media industry hasn’t done is really define what it means to have a cross platform solution. If you think about the heart of Nielsen’s Total Audience it really is the measurement of a program and get a complete view of a program across all of the platforms where it is available from linear TV, video on demand, digital, digital if it is through a provider like Hulu, digital on a network app. And the product scope is right to do that. But where Total Audience falls short is that we need a data ecosystem tool that allows us to see traditional linear spots together with digital addressable spots, to be able to plan those together, to be able to optimize those together, to be able to steward them together and then on the backend be able to measure their impact. There needs to be a forcing mechanism to get the industry to get together and decide what the system needs to do and then inform the measurement companies. 

Charlene Weisler: What should that forcing mechanism be?

Howard Shimmel: I think it should be the advertisers. They are the ones who are leaving ROI untapped because of the measurement challenges.  Bob Liodice at the ANA has been clear about this. If they lead, media and measurement companies have to fall in line and take their lead. 

Charlene Weisler: Looking forward, where do you see the media industry three to five years from now?

Howard Shimmel: I think we will get our measurement act together. Five years out I think we will do a much better job of stitching together linear, digital, over the top, virtual MVPD data together in a way where a media company has a way to take an advertiser, understand what their desired outcomes are and develop a plan that is not only geared to reach and frequency but is also geared to some sort of sales impact. You’ll see a lot more success among major media companies in terms of finding material direct to consumer businesses and ways to compliment the linear television ad model. Finally I think you will start to see all of the different content delivery systems – linear and digital and social- work together. We need to collaborate. As two industry leaders- Jack Myers and Dave Poltrack have stressed- we should be focused on finding ways to target below the line marketing dollars, not just fighting for share of existing media spend.





Mar 16, 2017

Solving the TV Data Puzzle With Broadcast

As the media industry continues to expand and evolve, keeping measurement as up-to-date as possible can be a challenge. From fragmented audiences moving across platforms and devices to the plethora of TV data produced by those devices, the question becomes, “What data is most useful, standard-izable and accurate for my purposes?” It is through this question that the strength of television over streaming data becomes clear.

High Expectations
Not only do measurement companies like Nielsen and comScore use standard datasets for measurement—they also offer cross-platform datasets to help stitch together the consumer journey. TV datasets from sources like Facebook, Hulu, Netflix, and Google have valuable measurement potential but are not fully shared externally, and none of them offer a full picture of media use. So while over-the-top (OTT) services remain popular, their data is not easily quantifiable within the broader media ecosystem.

Read the full article on the Videa blog.

Sep 26, 2013

The Future of Television May Only Be One Screen



You know that the definition of television is changing when a Future of Television conference is hosted by a company called Digital Media Wire. This event was part of the NY Games conference indicating to me that all content, no matter how it is delivered and used by the consumer, is part of the new and complex television ecosystem.

What is television today? I have explored this question in previous articles. But the Future of Television conference further expanded the definition in terms of content, distribution, monetization and venue viewing opportunities. The big takeaway for me was that television seems to have finally crossed the digital Rubicon, transitioning from the “delivery box” to a veritable state of mind, a programming option where no screen is primary. What is television today and what are the challenges to the current business model? Here are my ten top takeaways, not in any particular order:

1.   Marked Generational Differences in Television Usage
For Time Warner’s Joan Gilman, the definition of television has two answers - a professional and a personal one. At work it is program content – the creative. At home with her kids it is hardware based where they spend less time on the primary household screen but consume large amounts of content on second screens.

2.  Don’t Talk About the “Second Screen”. There is only One Screen
Among Millennials, the first screen of choice may not be the television set. It might be the tablet or mobile. Is there really a “second screen” anymore? Isn’t just “The Screen”? For Meredith’s Laura Rowley, her kids say that all you need for television is wifi. And according to Craig Palmer of Wikia, “If you use the second screen it is the first screen for you.”

3. More Programming Sources Expand Consumption - Time is Flexible and Expandable
Will there be more competition for viewers’ time as all of this new content – from Netflix, Yahoo, AOL, YouTube and other sources – needs to fit within the time that the average viewer allots for television entertainment? Not necessarily. “Video is invading other spheres of life.” Says Rowley. “Our site All Recipes .. can be downloaded via mobile in the grocery store. So we are expanding the hours used for entertainment. We offer a solution for consumers and insert a video in their day that didn't have a video before. In this way we are redefining TV with consumers consuming video in new places and in new ways.” 

4. Measurement is (Still) the Big Challenge
No matter how you define television, new sources of content make no impact unless you can measure it all properly and completely. Measurement has not kept up with the way content is being delivered and the concept of rating may not be as relevant today as it was in previous years. CPM may be less of an issue if they measure actual behavior in terms of reach and frequency. Anthony Wood of Roku explained that there are many sources of viewership that is not currently measured by Nielsen including Hulu Plus. How can you monetize it if you can’t measure it? A big step forward is asset identification coding that facilitates automatic content recognition across all screens. But it is still in process with no industry standard as of yet.

Joan Gillman of TWC talks about measurement:
 

5. The Borders May Soon Be Shifting
While the virtual MSO may still be in development, it does have the potential to upend the business model and change the viewing landscape. Think of TV without Borders.

6. Storytelling Trumps Technology But Give Technology It’s Due
Even with all the new and ever expanding range of viewing platforms, nothing is as important as being able to offer great and compelling content, as long as it is in context. Shane Rahmani of Electus says that the core of success is great storytelling but “what works on linear might not work on YouTube and it should be form factor appropriate.”

7. New Programming (and Advertising) Experimentations
Nick Demartino of Theatrics summed it up. “We are at the beginning of an unprecedented time of programming experimentation. We are evolving from the tyranny of the 22 minute sitcom.” But predicting the end of the 22 minute sitcom and 30 a second spot may be premature. Much of it is predicated on specific content. Some formats are better for digital and can be adapted from linear. Rich Cusick of Yahoo offered this insight: “Buzzy moments have resonance and can be inexpensive to produce. We took a (longer) program segment and found users only wanted to viewed the buzzy moments that they cared about. We edited it down to 3 minutes and increased viewing.”

8. But Old Programming Has a Great Value Too
Magisto’s Reid Genauer spoke of “decades worth of content with no place to live today.” In his company, they are experimenting to bring that content back into the social dialogue. He says, “Our videos get the same number of views per month as an episode of Breaking Bad.”

Shane Rahmani (Electus) and Rich Cusick (Yahoo) talk about the Impact of Data on Content


9. TV Everywhere is A Temporary Advantage for MSOs, At Best
When asked if TVE is working for MSOs, Steve Ronson of A+E equivocated. I would answer that question as, “it depends, not so much and maybe. It may help MVPDs to some extent but the problem is in its execution.” Karen Cahn of AOL called TVE “A band aid solution” since consumers want content and don’t really care about the delivery provider. But Craig Palmer of Wikia feels that the “traditional model will go away since kids don’t feel the need to be subscribers.” And what about delivery via IPTV?

10. Celebrity Participation Helps Drive Appeal
It was agreed that celebrity involvement helps in attracting audience and attention. But while celebrity participation helps drive content, the definition of celebrity is fungible. AOL’s Cahn said, “Influencers don't have to be a household name but they can influence popularity.”  Will everyone be able to get their 15 minutes of fame more easily?