Showing posts with label Total Audience. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Total Audience. Show all posts

Apr 27, 2022

A+E Measures Total Audience Where Every Person Counts

Ageism seems to permeate our society. This not only negatively impacts self-esteem and relationships with each other, it also can negatively impact business economics. A+E Networks has conducted extensive research to help solve for ageism, if not as of yet for society in general, at least in the business world.

According to Tara Lantieri, Senior Director, Primary Research, Ad Sales Strategic Insights at A+E Networks, “The World Health Organization has done extensive work on the issue of ageism globally, on stereotypes, prejudice, discrimination, how we act towards others or oneself based on age. A lot of the research we've been doing is on how so much of ageism is internalized and self-directed. It's a complex issue in the world and prevalent one.”

Marcella Tabares, Senior Vice President, Strategic & Cultural Insights, Ad Sales Research, A+E Networks concurred. “We start developing ageism beliefs and ideas at a very young age. Children between ages three to four already have some culturally, socially constructed ideas of what age means and they’re usually embedded. We started looking at younger age groups in addition to older to fully understand what the effects of those perceptions are,” she noted.

A+E Networks set out on a course of action, called Total Audience - Every Person Counts, to fully understand the complexities of audiences 18-74 and parsing out differences and similarities between 18-49s and 50-74s. “When we talk about every person counts, we mean every person, regardless of age,” Lantieri stated.

“There are two things happening,” Tabares noted, “Young people are cultivating these ideas of what old age looks like, receiving those messages from visual imagery and projecting those ideas onto others. That's why advertising and media are so important. We construct what the world looks like, what identity looks like. Only then do we project those onto others and start internalizing them. We see how it's impacting young people in their 30s and 40s.They actually hold more negative views and feelings about aging than people who are older, because people who are older are ‘in it.’ You've arrived and you realize that it is not as bad as it's been presented to you for decades.”

It’s notable that, according to the research, older adults feel pretty good about themselves. “The reality is, I feel good, I feel strong, I feel active, I'm curious. For me, I turned 50 this year and this is the best time of my life,” Tabares stated.

The challenge to getting this important point across and changing minds is impacted by attitudes of young  agency buyers and planners. “When you look at this industry with a median age in the agency in their 30s or maybe early 40s,” Tabares began, “How can they authentically relate to the experience of aging, and further, how are they able to authentically depict that experience in the creative narratives? It's very hard to do that. So we talked about representation in terms making strategic decisions in creative executions.”

Adequate representation of older adults is another challenge.  “What I found particularly jarring and shocking was the level of representation. Our study of national TV ads found that only one in 10 faces appear to be 50 years or older, yet 50+ year olds account for 46% of the adult population,” Tabares shared. Further, “within that was the lack of representation among older women. Only one in three of those faces appear to be female, yet women account for like 52% of the population. “

She noted that context too, reinforces ageism. “You start to see how small their world is constructed. We're much more likely to see older adults using a newspaper and a lot less likely than younger adults to be using technology. They are a lot less likely to be driving, more likely to be walking or in the house. The world that is constructed is so small and this plays into the stereotypical ideas of where older people are.”

Notably, the research paints an entirely different picture. “And yet,” Tabares, explained, “When we hear from older adults in the research, when we listen to them, we hear about their diversity of experience and all of the ways that they're living their lives. It's much more engaged. It's much more social. It's much more connected with the world. It’s very important for us as an industry to be more invested in understanding the experience.”

There is also the buying power of older adults which has been covered repeatedly in the press. “We talk about the scale of the population, their buying power and their ad receptivity as quantitative points. I don't think it's something that we need to continue to prove because that is like asking me, ‘What is the value of people?’ which is the real question we are asking,” Lantieri posited and added, “A lot of people aren't  trying to reach them and not trying to include them, so I think the first thing we should think about is purposeful inclusion in a way that is truly engaging and true to their experiences.“

It is not difficult for advertisers to get this right, she noted. “It does require balance but advertisers can absolutely get this balance right. We saw in our test that many already have. It's about balancing realism and repeatability, inspiration and respect. Depictions need to be realistic enough that people can relate to them, but they also have to be inspirational enough that there is a sense of things to look forward to.” It is possible to create advertising that resonates and appeals across all age groups.

The good news is that, according to Lantieri, “The data is showing that people are satisfied with their lives and valuing themselves well across many different dimensions that we asked about. I think it's important to acknowledge the challenges of getting older, but do so in a way that doesn't provoke fear. Showing adults and meaningful relationships is also really key because it demonstrates worthiness,” showing the physical aspects of aging in a positive light and show older adults as capable but not patronizingly so.

Finally, the old canard of older people feel younger than they are, therefore they want to see younger people in ads, is just not true. “I'm not sure where this came from. We’ve seen consistently in our work that people feel about on average 15 to 17 years younger than their age. But feeling younger doesn't translate directly to wanting to see somebody whose looks and body version is 15 years younger. We’ve tested this explicitly because we believed that it’s a myth that's perpetuated for decades and still lives on today,” Tabares revealed.

So for advertisers grappling with the careful balance of engaging both young and old consumers, Tabares has some words of advice. “Show me a real person who looks about my age, where I'm at in my life. We found that works well especially with multi-generational ads. It's not an either or solution. There is a way to appeal to all by showing both younger and older people in a social or family setting, the way we live our lives authentically. That is a key takeaway,” she concluded.

This article first appeared in www.MediaVillage.com

Artwork by Charlene Weisler

Aug 19, 2018

Peter Katsingris Offers Insights From Nielsen’s Total Audience Report

Add caption
“Consumers have never been more connected than they are today,” stated Peter Katsingris, SVP, Nielsen Audience Insights. “Media consumption is no longer restricted to the living room but follows them wherever they go with the content of their choosing always within reach.”  

With Americans now spending an astounding 11 hours per day using media, according to Nielsen, the stakes for media companies and advertisers is high to insure that their messages are reaching the right audiences at the right time on the right platform through the right device. Nielsen has been diligently tracking consumer usage so as to offer their clients a more accurate look at how today’s consumers are navigating their ever growing media choices.

How will all of this impact the future of media? Katsingris offered his insights into the latest Nielsen Total Audience Report:

Charlene Weisler: How can half of the average American's day be filled with consuming media? Certainly there is a lot of multi-tasking but what about de-duped usage?

Peter Katsingris: Within the 11 hours per day of media usage there is some amount of simultaneous usage across devices.

Charlene Weisler: Where is the greatest growth coming from? How will this impact future usage?

Peter Katsingris: The greatest growth is among TV-Connected device use, whether it is the smart TV or other connected-devices that enable streaming content to the TV set. Streaming will continue to grow as the way people consume content through the TV glass evolves.  Additionally, digital device usage, particularly smartphones, is growing as consumers continue to personalize their media use. The options available to the consumer will result in a more “on-demand”, a la carte experience that consumers can access media anywhere and through whatever device is most convenient to them at that time. 

Charlene Weisler: TV looks to be consistently #1 in time usage. Do you see that continuing?

Peter Katsingris: It’s often said that TV is dying, but our data paints a different picture. People spend a lot of time in front of the TV set, whether it is Live, watching recorded content via their DVR or on-demand or even a subscription service through a TV connected device. Linear TV viewing continues to remain a substantial portion of the overall share of media usage.  But it varies by demographic.  Younger adults spend less time with linear than older adults and television accounts for a smaller percentage of that time.  However, they still watch television and will continue in one form or another.  

Charlene Weisler: Younger viewers are consuming less live TV. What are the long term implications?

Peter Katsingris: Younger generations have always been early adopters. With viewing content, early adoption means young people are engaging with platforms and devices that drive new habits, however, some of these new ways to connect still end up with a young consumer in front of a TV. 

Charlene Weisler: How much streaming is happening to the TV? 

Peter Katsingris: Consumers are incrementally spending more time on the television set streaming content. Overall, based on the Q1 2018 Nielsen Total Audience Report, half of adults 18+ are using TV connected devices (DVD/Blu-Ray, Game Console, Internet Connected Devices, Smart TV apps) to watch or use media content and that accounts for nearly 10 hours a week. Using Nielsen’s Streaming Meter we have a more complete understanding of streaming that’s occurring to the TV set. What we see is that among homes that have that ability, one out of every 10 minutes for adults was streaming content to the television set. Younger consumers having a higher percent of streaming of overall total TV usage.

Charlene Weisler: Which devices are consumers using to stream to the TV? 

Peter Katsingris: Two-thirds of homes have the ability to stream content via internet enabled TV connected devices like game consoles, smart TVs or internet connected device (i.e. Apple TV, Roku, Google Chromecast, Amazon Firestick). Teens are more likely to use game consoles to stream while older adults use a smart TV.  Across all TV households, about a third only use one device and another third use more than one device, indicating the multiple options consumers have. Typically homes with multiple device use have a combination of a video game console with another streaming device.

Charlene Weisler: What are the overall SVOD trends that this report uncovered? 

Peter Katsingris: The report focused on access to the three main Subscription Video On-Demand services of Netflix, Hulu and Amazon Prime Video.  More consumers have and continue to want access to these multiple channel(s) in their home compared to last year. Among total households, access to these services is up to 64% of television homes in March 2018, from 58% a year ago. Similar to devices that enable streaming in the home, people have access to multiple services with 37% of television households having access to 2 or more of the services. 

Charlene Weisler: How is SVOD impacting linear TV consumption? 

Peter Katsingris: It’s hard to look at SVOD in a vacuum because streaming encompasses a broad array of services, including SVOD, AVOD (Advertising supported VOD) and Virtual MVPDs like Sling TV and Hulu Live. An underappreciated impact of SVOD is that it exposes consumers to a different way of accessing content, via menus, as opposed to traditional channel surfing. This translates into adoption of products (e.g. VMVPD’s) that provide those improved interfaces and easy app-based access. We are seeing that with homes subscribing to those services. Also, SVOD provides extra channels to choose from and when there is more choice, it impacts behavior and impacts traditional linear services. Prior research has shown that once someone acquires a device capable of streaming content, there is a change traditional TV use. However, people will continue to watch the programs they like regardless of additional content services they subscribe to and use them to complement current behaviors.  

Charlene Weisler: How can linear TV companies use SVOD to inform their business strategy? 

Peter Katsingris: I’m not sure there is such a thing as a “linear TV” company any longer. Every one of our clients has a cross-platform strategy to reach their consumer, wherever that consumer is. Last year we launched Nielsen SVOD Content Ratings. This allows our clients-- studios, networks and others-- to see how their SVOD programming is performing as well as how this content may be impacting their linear businesses or even help with decisions around scheduling and licensing.

This article first appeared in www.MediaVillage.com
 

May 12, 2016

Nielsen Reveals Total Audience Data Results



The race is on for seamless, de-duplicated cross platform measurement. Nielsen recently announced results from their Total Audience solution and shared some initial data findings with the press this past week.
Nielsen spokesman Ben Billingsley opened the meeting and stated that “Total audience is the framework for measuring audiences across platforms so that the data can be presented in comparable fashion from TV to digital on a like for like basis.” Nielsen is currently working with clients who are reviewing their data from Total Audience.  Nielsen’s presentation was based on blinded cuts of the data and the results were presented by Glenn Enoch, SVP Audience Insights. 

Enoch explained that his presentation would give us “a sense for what kind of consumer insights can be gleaned from Total Audience and to demonstrate its full capabilities. Today, we are able to look at individual pieces of content and can see how consumers got to them whether Live, Time Shifted, via VOD, (whether the same ad load or different or no ad load), on the pc or smartphone or tablet. Essentially, what is the mix of vectors the viewers use to get to the content.”

In a departure from the industry standards for measuring viewership plus 3 or 7 days, viewership to content in Total Audience will be counted into perpetuity enabling the ability to see how viewership changes over time, even years. The data presented at the breakfast reflected Adults 18-49 in a mixture of both broadcast and cable individual programs. The data was collected into buckets of viewership source and was reported collectively and by genre.

Here are some of the takeaways:

        1.       All programs experience lift above the Live plus 7 days delivery, although the degree of lift varies by genre – some by as much as +50%.

        2.       Programs that have more lift tend to get that lift later – after day 35.

        3.       Different platforms have different levels of lift. For example, DVR contribution tends to be more front-loaded. It delivers less and less lift as time goes on, based on the average of all networks included in the analysis.

        4.       Programs with viewership after 35 days are tending to get lift from VOD - on any device that is a source of VOD.

        5.       The amount of lift and the type of platform used for viewing varies by program genre over time.
-  Reality competition shows have the least amount of lift over time because of the timeliness of the content. “Most to all viewing is done upfront, within first week,” according to Enoch. “All viewing is done in the first month and it affects the vector that people do to get to the show,” he added. Most viewing is either Live or DVR while only 7% of viewing to reality competition is on VOD.
-  Serial dramas have the second lowest amount of lift, followed by episodic dramas such as crime shows that are more standalone in terms of story line and can be viewed out of order. 76% of all viewing of serial dramas takes place in the first week indicating that viewers want to see one episode before the next one airs while with episodic dramas, 39% of all consumption is after day 7.
-  Sitcoms tend to experience similar lift to episodics but the viewing vectors have a more equal distribution of DVR and VOD.
-  Adult animated comedies experience the greatest amount of lift over time in this analysis and more than half of the viewing is using library content on VOD.

        6.       The method of viewing changes as distance from original air grows, shifting from Live and DVR to more VOD and Digital. 

        7.       Viewers will watch longer when they are viewing on demand.  For two hour-long programs, viewing time was up from 15-20 mins on average for live viewing to over 30 mins for on-demand viewing. (Total content duration was about 45 minutes because ads are not measured). The presumption as to why this is that “Live viewing is more fluid,” according to Enoch, “while with VOD, one chooses to view that program.”

        8.       On demand audiences tend to be younger.

        9.       Online viewing length is longer than Live and are younger than Live.

        10.   A larger percentage of TV content viewing is consumed on larger screens, not on smaller screens. Tablets, for example, “are designed for shorter term consumption,” according to Enoch.

“This data enables our clients and the industry to understand how audiences build across time,” said Kelly Abcarian, SVP of Product Leadership at Nielsen. “So the networks and the broadcasters and the content owners can have more firepower to talk about how their audience looks across time so they can better position and plan and sell that out to advertisers."

Next steps, Nielsen will be releasing the ability for clients to look at source of consumption on connected devices such as Amazon, Roku, Chromecast, Xbox etc.  There is an increasing use of connected devices that are displacing traditional TV happening in homes with SVOD content. Stay tuned.

This article first appeared in www.MediaBizBloggers.com