Showing posts with label multiplatform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label multiplatform. Show all posts

Nov 24, 2014

TV - Evolution or Revolution? A Look at B&C's MultiPlatform Conference




There is more chatter than usual about the future of the traditional TV model with hand wringing across all media disciplines from measurement, to technology, to consumer affinities, to platform usage and business silos. Can MVPDs keep up with the pace of change? Can content providers maximize the value of their offerings across platforms? What is the future of TVE, OTT, TV programmatic on the core business? 

There are no pan-industry experts (that I know of) but there are astute minds in specific areas. So when one attends a conference that places experts across the spectrum in one venue, it is a cornucopia of ideas and revelations. Such was the recent B&C MultiChannel Content Show which included panels on MultiPlatform and Addressable Advertising.

There were so many great panels and speakers that the following takeaways are from the MulitPlaform conference. Addressable Advertising takeaways will follow in a future column:

Authentication is Still Not Where It Should Be
OTT, it was generally agreed, was a good thing for consumers, MVPDs and content providers. But authentication remains a roadblock for many consumers. Marty Roberts from The Platform admitted that "as a technologist, there is still more to do (with authentication).  Authentication is now at about 55%. That is not good enough. Consumers want to login and just watch their show. The problem is that consumers don't know their credentials. "

Measurement is Improving But is Not There Yet. And Stubborn Silos Remain
Cross platform measurement has seen some recent improvements but there is still much to be done including breaking down the measurement silos by combining measurement platforms, evolving the business model away from proxy measures and forming common metrics across platforms.
TWC's Joan Gillman explained that "We have trained the consumers to consume media whenever and wherever they want but what hasn't caught up is the measurement. Long tails don't get credit." That is because TV buying continues to be bought by age gender proxy. However Big Data is slowly moving the measurement needle. AT&T 's Kristyn Clement noted that "We are moving away from the Nielsen panel. We might use Rentrak or Nielsen or both and we will continue to see that evolve. The days of a single currency has past us."

Jane Clarke of CIMM believes that “We will probably end up with two (measurement) layers; A planning layer with a holistic measurement and a system that gets to unduplicated content and ad measurement in single system. But actual trading currency probably needs a trading platform. Advertisers want purchaser targets. They no longer want w25-54. So we will also need a transactional layer to get the right ad to right person at right time.”

Some believe that measurement challenges will be solved over time as older viewers give way to younger who have very different consumption preferences. Ian Greenblatt of ARRIS noted that “The under-measurement of OTT is generational. Younger viewers will actively search out quality content in whichever silo it is living.”

Content Truisms Remain Truisms ... Until They Don’t
How many times have we heard that content is king? That is still true; Without good, compelling, engaging content, our quest for better measurement and monetization is quixotic. The interesting nuance to this is how different forms of content succeed in different ways depending on the technology. Fewer television series are viewed live with viewers preferring to watch on their own schedules, on a variety of devices and via other content aggregators. News and Sports, however, continue to be viewed live, albeit on a wider range of platforms. Obviously, consumers will decide the TV model. Penthera’s Michael Willner says, “I admit I am getting more into watching programs on my iPad. Though it will be the consumers who will decide how TV evolves.”

Better Technology is Always on the Horizon - Keep on Top of It
Technology is advancing faster than it can be accommodated into the media business but many of these new innovations can result in greater profitability for savvy companies. Optimization of ad avail pricing is essentially here. Greenblatt says that “Ad tech is one of the hottest areas. There are lots of new players there. (It will soon be possible to) price upcoming avails in a stream leading to pricing in real time. You can digitally insert specific ad for specific audience in specific time and dynamically re- price.”

In the area of content, the sophistication of new viewing platforms may require more careful integration of technology to maximize the viewer experience. Jens Loeffler of Adobe noted that “Sports is challenging technically in cross platform. There is a need for higher resolution and frame rates for fast moving content. We need to focus on good compression and capacity.” In fact technological needs vary by sport. According to Eric Black of NBC sports, “In golf and swimming, compression is critically important. We need to differentiate tuning for a specific sport.”

Don't Fear Change
The only way to succeed today is to embrace change. Some companies are immersed in advancement but there are still too many that are mired in inaction - preferring to stick to the traditional way of doing business until forced to react. Rentrak’s Bruce Goerlich noted that "Inertia is our biggest challenge." Taking a chance is risky but change-paralysis is riskier. According to Willner, "By far the most successful businesses are ones who understand consumers’ behaviors and how they change.  If we spend time protecting the status quo someone else will come along with the best new widget. So we need to change or perish."

Fostering this atmosphere of rapid change are the accelerating announcements of mergers, acquisitions and new inventions / methodologies whether it is TWC and Cablevision or CBS or HBO. Where is your company in the discussion?

First published, in abbreviated form, on MediaPost.com

Apr 1, 2013

What is Next For TV? Check Out the Next TV Summit.



If there is anything that is constant about television these days, it is the constant change. From digital compression a few years ago to today’s connected TVs, multi and cross platforming, second + screens, STBs, OTT, Big Data sets, authentication and  ACR, it is hard to keep pace. But thankfully there are conferences like  B&C MultiChannel’s Next TV Summit to help frame the changes and fill in any knowledge gaps.

Today’s TV landscape faces a viewer in transition. While there are still mainstream couch potatoes, according to keynote speaker Eric Free from Intel, there is also a burgeoning class of connected viewers who tend to skew younger and are not constrained by the current media business model. He spoke of three pillars of change: consumer behavior, technology infrastructure and current business models, which are all occurring right now, ready or not. Free is optimistic about this type of future. He believes that the best attributes of live television are merging with social features so as to offer better discovery and social activity for younger connected consumers that will encourage them to stay within the TV ecosystem. We should hope that he is correct. It may be that the advent of connected televisions will enable the television industry to maintain relevancy with these younger connected viewers. And so, this technology could not have come at a better time.

It is arguably within the current business model that television will find its greatest challenge for future hearts, minds and eyeballs. Content providers continue to experiment with forms of storytelling and methods for bridging platforms to complete the full viewing experience. But cord cutting, cord shaving and cord “nevering” will continue. And therein lies the rub: We as an industry continue to cleave to old and eroding business models, metrics and, yes, mindsets even as our world shifts to complete organic viewing experiences. Why still target demographically, for example, when the marketplace really needs to target psychographically? We say that measurement is critical but the old metrics are still silo-ed by platform and applied to business tracking.

MultiChannel News’ Todd Spengler moderated a panel on TV Everywhere: Disruption, Innovation & Invention which brought the measurement issue into focus. Thomas Siegman of RSG Media noted that the rights issue was impeding measurement possibilities - “We need rights for streaming and we need to gauge the total value of a view.” And John Heller of FreeWheel argued for speed because “moving too slow is worse than too fast.” Watermarking is another challenge. Is there an industry standard?
Michael Bishara of Synacor went one step further, listing the top five challenges of TV Everywhere. They are
1.       Marketing in the form of awareness, early stages of VOD, education, rights and gaps in content and its availability.
2.       Economic.  How can we monetize?
3.       Competition. Content alternatives out there that are equally compelling. 
4.       Technology… but it will become automated in future.  Authentication. Credentials.
5.       Consumer experience. Don't make consumers work. Unify and make sense for the consumer.
So how can we as an industry best face the future, overcome the challenges and succeed in an evolving landscape?  Mark Greenberg, President & CEO of EPIX may have provided the best advice. He admonished us to change the rules. There is a lesson to be learned from the music industry versus Napster. We need to battle arrogance, indifference and ignorance and find new ways to monetize content on every platform and build relevance among younger viewers. “Cable used to be the revolutionaries” he said. “Cable used to be the destructive force bringing value to the consumers. Now we are the problem. Disrupt or be disruptive. Don't rest on our laurels. Let’s get back into the disruption business.”
Amen.

Dec 17, 2012

The TV of Tomorrow: The Secrets Revealed


As much as I think I can keep track of all new digital innovations, it is close to impossible now. There are so many technological advancements that have the potential to upend television as we know it today as evidenced by the announcements at last week’s TV of Tomorrow conference.

Tracy Swedlow, founder and Editor in Chief of Interactive TV Today (www.itvt.com) has been a front runner in the field of digital media development and reportage since the early 1990s. At the time, while researching virtual reality, she realized that the internet could impact television at its very basic level. By 2006 she formed the TV of Tomorrow conference which gathers all silo’ed technology such as mobile, internet, smart TV, gaming and advanced advertising to present a one expansive multi-platform interactive television conference.  She discusses the TV of Tomorrow, its genus and its future in this video:







Sam Pemberton from Softel was the morning’s keynote speaker. His introduction to the conference was instructive. “If you are into interactivity, this is the place. (The conference offers) a view of what is happening now in the industry, what is the state of the art now and what is coming in the future.” He spoke of change as always being a good thing because it brings opportunities. “And opportunities abound in our industry now.”
Media is changing, particularly in the advancements of Smart TVs and smart second screens. These technologies impact the way viewers interact with media. If we thought fragmentation and attention were challenges before multi-screens, now it is epidemic. According to MRI, 34% of viewers post while watching TV, 25% visit websites of shows and 63% of tablet users interact with their device while viewing TV. In addition, 80% of smartphone owners use their device while in front of the TV and 81% of tablet owners use their device while watching TV. And fragmentation will only increase; Smart TV sales are up 41%. 

Measurement Challenges
Can measurement keep up? According to the conference consensus, measurement is already lagging behind.  There was some criticism of Nielsen which is the industry currency for television but not for online. Cross platform measurement consistency is a current challenge for Nielsen that it is now beginning to address.

For Dan Suratt of A+E, “We don't use Nielsen online measurement because Nielsen doesn’t match our internal logs. The results are often wildly off- both up and down. If we know it isn't right online, how do we know it is right on air?” Stacey Lynn Schulman conceded that “Consumers are adopting technology faster than we can measure it and it is hard to measure. We have to join hands ad figure it out.” And GroupM’s Mike Bologna agreed “It's easy to complain. Nielsen is not perfect. We ask 20,000 what they watch and assume the rest watches the same. But we are part of the problem too. We just complain." And he conceded that “Most clients don't want to risk new measurements. We would be considered out of line if we went around the current measurement.”

Solutions to this measurement conundrum was offered by such companies as comScore, Rentrak, Kantar, FourthWall, Media Ocean and organizations that explore such issues as CIMM (Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement).  Rentrak’s Cathy Hetzel , for example, approached the challenge by looking at multi and cross platform via an assigned episode code. In this way they know where and when the episode is being viewed. Recent studies involving cross platform solutions and set top box data, as well as asset identification for all content (a CIMM initiative) have helped move the needle towards a more comprehensive measurement. 

Technology Advancements
Measurement aside, there are also the issues of technology advancements, the roll-out of Smart TV’s (and their potential to upend current viewer experiences with their TV set) and advanced advertising to help monetize the digital evolution.

The big news of the day was an announcement by wireWAX which is a self-serve platform for making video interactive.  They have the ability to make the TV living room environment an interactive experience capable of gesture control through the use of a Microsoft 360 connection into a TIVO box. In this way they can move TV content from a passive lean-back experience to active lean-forward experience. Relaxing in front of the TV? Don’t scratch your nose! 



Monetization Factors
How do you monetize these advancements? While advancements can allow for better targeting, Seth Haberman posited that there is can be a difference in audience quality when measurement is based solely on something like clicks. “Those who click the most have the most time to click” such as more downscale viewers.  Since the multiscreen world is fragmenting before us, we need to better ascertain what the economic difference are between mass viewing and individual on demand viewing.
Questions abound: When you factor in attention to a second screen while viewing a primary screen (such as when you  drive a viewer to a second screen for advertising or social media) how do you really know where the viewer is focusing their attention? Terms like “engagement-based advertising” sound compelling but how do you standardize and scale a measurement for that? And can that shift be appropriately monetized? (If an ad created to drive synchronization costs $100k, can you really generate $100k worth of income from that ad? Who knows?) Is binge viewing beneficial? Does it chew up inventory too quickly or does it enhance loyalty?

No matter how we solve the monetization equation, ultimately, it all comes down to content. Several panelists reaffirmed that content is king and without content there are no advertisers. It just needs to be measurable and easy. For MVPDs, TV Everywhere is the cost of doing business today and gives customers the ability to justify the value of their monthly cable bill. 

What will next year’s TVOT bring? Stay tuned….