Saturday

Scripps Presentation on Set Top Box Data

The Set Top Box Data arena currently includes many data originators, processors and end users each using and examining the data in different ways. The hope of the industry is that these data analyses can eventually lead to some level of standardization and possible currency.

One step in this quest was the creation of a Lexicon of Terms and Definitions which was commissioned by CIMM and involved the cooperation on many major STB companies and clients.

Other steps include interesting comparison analyses with other currencies. Mike Pardee, SVP Research at Scripps, has been deeply involved in examining STB data. He has graciously allowed the posting of one of his department's presentations here. This presentation is called "A Mingle Source Look At Set Top Box Data."





















Tuesday

Q&A Interview with Steve McGowan - Discovery

Steve McGowan returned to Discovery this year after a seven year stint at Nielsen. Currently Steve is SVP Research at Discovery and has a unique perspective on the evolution of the company from small start-up to large conglomerate. In this in-depth interview, Steve talks about a range of subjects including set top box data Nielsen, the evolution of DVRs and predictions for the next five years.

There are three videos that cover the following topics:

Subject Length (in minutes)
Background, DVRS and VOD (6:11)
Set Top Box Data (3:50)
Past, Future and CTAM (4:25)



Charlene Weisler Interviews Steve McGowan, SVP Discovery, who discusses his background in this 6:11 minute video:




Steve McGowan talks about his Nielsen work with set top box data in this 3:50 minute video:




Charlene Weisler talks to Steve McGowan who shares his thoughts on the past changes in the industry, future predictions and the importance of CTAM:

Friday

Q&A Interview with Todd Lituchy


Todd Lituchy has had an extensive media career, much of it in the international arena spanning three continents. His unique perspectives on international media make for a fascinating interview. Todd is the President of New Media Vision which helps clients expand their global footprints, develop new channel launches, and sell product globally.

In this interview, Todd talks about his background, the differences in international marketplaces, TV Everywhere, the internet’s impact on television viewership and offers some future predictions for the next few years.

CW: Todd, what is your background - how did you get to where you are today?

TL: I have worked in television for the past 20 years. My first job was in the NBC research department in NYC while still in college. After college, I had short stints at Lifetime Television, Viacom, and Nielsen. Then, after receiving an MBA from Columbia University, I moved to Los Angeles. I spent 5 years working for Walt Disney Studios in research and moved over to the programming side and ran Program Planning & Acquisitions for UPN. I was then recruited to run Viasat Broadcasting’s entertainment division. Based in London, I oversaw Program Planning, Acquisitions, and Commissioning for Viasat’s free and pay TV channels throughout Europe. After 5 years, I left to run the creative departments of News Corps’ Asian TV operations as President of Entertainment for STAR TV based in Hong Kong. I returned to London last year to start my own media consulting firm, New Media Vision. Initial clients include: Discovery Networks International, BBC Worldwide, and a number of production companies globally. It is a very exciting time for me.


CW: Tell me more about Viasat Broadcasting and what you did there.

TL: I was President of Entertainment at Viasat and it was a great job. I worked with people from all over Europe. We had free-to-air channels in a dozen countries and pay channels in roughly 30 countries. I worked on channels that were the highest rated channels in their markets as well as startup channels – talking them from pre-launch to launch to profitability. I also had the benefit of working on ad-supported channels and premium cable channels; general entertainment channels and niche channels (news, music, history, film, and factual programming). The job also allowed me to develop a strong track record in commissioning. In addition to working with the country CEOs and channel heads at picking strong local productions off of paper for our markets I pushed the company heavily into the format arena. During my tenure, we did the first local adaptations globally of Wife Swap, Queer Eye For The Straight Guy, Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, You Are What You Eat, and others. Plus we did local versions of Pop Idol, Survivor, Deal or No Deal, and Who Wants To Be A Millionaire. It was an amazing learning experience.


CW: What is the difference between the American, Asian and European media marketplaces?

TL: I have found that things vary more on an individual country basis than on a continental basis. Some countries rely heavily on local production; others are extremely competitive when it comes to acquisitions. In some markets there are volume an output deals and it is difficult to do ad-hoc acquisitions. In other markets, such as the UK ad-hoc acquisitions are the norm. From a production standpoint, the production values from the US studios are top notch, but you’d be surprised at how solid programs look on a $10-20,000 per hour budget coming out of Eastern Europe or Asia. I admire the risk-taking that comes out of the UK and The Netherlands. You see a lot of interesting concepts being tested on air.


CW: Tell me about New Media Vision.

TL: New Media Vision is my baby. I started the company at the end of last year helping international clients with format scouting and expansion of their channel portfolios. I have worked with start-up organizations as well as established global media companies with billions in revenue. Lately, I have started working with content owners helping them sell finished product globally and with producers to help them sell their formats across the world. I am working with interesting people and I get to choose the projects that are appealing to me. It is very empowering to hone my skills across a wide variety of disciplines, including: program development, research, format scouting, sales, channel management, acquisitions, production, and digital strategy.


CW: What do you think has been the most dramatic change in the industry in the past 5 years?

TL: TV Everywhere – the ability to watch TV shows online and over mobile phones. It is a huge game changer and is a fantastic advancement from a consumer perspective. In terms of programming and scheduling, it has made the industry rethink a lot of traditional practices. From a business side, we are still trying to work out how to monetize it.


CW: How do you think we can best measure TV Everywhere? Will the measurement differ across countries and if so how and why?

TL: I think media research companies will strive to measure television viewership however and wherever it is viewed. In addition to measuring traditional TV sets, it is important to measure streaming video on the Internet, inside and outside of the home, and to measure viewing on mobile platforms such as cellular phones and iPads. I think measurement will likely differ across countries for a number of reasons including technological differences and the cost required to capture the information.


CW: Please give me three predictions for the next 5 years.

TL: An increased commitment to co-productions: we have seen a spike in international casting in American programs over the past few years (House, Flashforward, Bionic Woman, Fringe, and Lost, just to name a few) and this will lead to the next step which is for international networks to co-fund series and take a role in creative decisions. Internet connected TVs: new TV sets will have internet connections allowing consumers to watch YouTube, Hulu, BBC iPlayer, and other catch-up services on their main TV set instead of their computers. International formats will continue to appear on TV screens in the US and UK, but companies will start looking beyond The Netherlands and Japan for strong ideas. The world is full of great television content.


CW: How will Internet ready TV’s impact media usage?

TL: Overall, Internet ready TVs will cause an increase in media usage. Almost anytime consumers get new hardware for their TVs – whether it was cable boxes, VCRs, or DVRs, -- viewership increases. This will be the case with Internet ready TVs as well. You won’t see an across the board increase for all channels, so that makes the old guard nervous. You will see consumers watching YouTube, iPlayer, Hulu and other catch-up services directly on their living room sets and, in aggregate, viewership will increase.



Interview conducted by Charlene Weisler, a research veteran, member of the Set Top Box Collaborative executive committee, the CTAM Research and Research Planning Committees and a CIMM consultant. She can be reached through her blog www.WeislerMedia.blogspot.com or at WeislerMedia@yahoo.com.

Q&A Interview with David Leider - GSTV

David Leider is the CEO of GSTV, also known as Gas Station Television. David has an extraordinary background in media, particularly at the agencies –both traditional and interactive – and at Yahoo. Now, his work with out of home has spawned new measurement techniques and has created more valuation opportunities for all out of home advertising. In this interview, David talks about GSTV, the special Nielsen-based measurement he used for valuation, how his service is unique from other outdoor advertising and video content providers. He also talks about the differences in agency shops from traditional to interactive and how they are evolving as well as positing how the media landscape will look in the next five years.

The videos in this fascinating interview cover the following topics:

Subject Length (in minutes)
Background (5:35)
GSTV & Measurement (9:04)
Future, Out of Home (6:16)
Ethnography and Environment (7:07)



Charlene Weisler interviews David Leider, CEO of GSTV. David talks about his extensive background. This video is 5:35 minutes long:




David Leider talks about GSTV and how it is measured in this 9:04 minute video. GSTV delivers over 26 million at the pump viewers and almost 30 million total, including their C-Store TV network:




Charlene Weisler interviews David Leider, CEO of GSTV who talks about the future of media and out of home in this 6:16 minute long video:




David Leider, CEO of GSTV talks about ethnographic research and how environment impacts media usage. This video is 7:07 minutes long:

Sunday

Q&A Interview with Jim Multari - Sprout

Jim Multari, Director of Research for Sprout, has great experience in the supplier side of research before moving to Sprout four years ago. Jim is currently exploring how to measure and position Sprout through the use of custom research and set top box data. In this interview, Jim talks about how Sprout researches parental preferences, how Sprout behaviorally targets parents of pre-schoolers, what the future is for measurement, cross platform and changes in research since he first started as a data analyst.

The videos in this fascinating interview cover the following topics:

Subject Length (in minutes)
Background (5:45)
Sprout, STB Data, Cross Platform (5:43)
CTAM (1:55)
BT, DVR, Predictions (6:38)
Targeting Pre-schoolers (6:04)




Charlene Weisler interviews Jim Multari of Sprout who talks about his background in thei 5:45 minute video:




Charlene Weisler interviews Jim Multari of Sprout who talks about Sprout, the use of set top box data in measurement and cross platform in this 5:43 minute video:




Research Director Jim Multari talks about CTAM and his participation in CTAM committees in this 1:55 minute video:




Charlene Weisler interviews Jim Multari who discusses behavioral targeting, DVR use and offers some future predictions and insights. The video is 6:38 minutes long:




Jim Multari talks about how Sprout not only research parental preferences but also how the network targets pre-schoolers in this 6:04 minute video:

Tuesday

A Set Top Box Data Ratio

MPG held its Collaborative Alliance meeting in New York on June 3, 2010. At the meeting, a group of us who formed the Collaborative Set Top Box Data Committee posited a method to apply set top box data to help networks that are not rated by Nielsen to translate their data for use by the agencies and their national television buyers. As we stressed during the meeting, this is directional and not intended as a data comparison.


Background
This ratio percentage was not created in a vacuum. We consider it a next step in a series of careful analyses of various cuts of set top box data from different data aggregators. We present it as one more example of the efficacy and usability of set top box data for measurement.

Past analyses have shown that when set top box data results are compared to Nielsen:
 There are similar performance ranks for larger networks
 There are similar percent share of GRPs for broadcast networks
 There is a high correlation between homes delivery of the two data sets in some local markets.

With the knowledge gained from these past analyses, we felt that we could create a ratio percentage using STB data that can be used to help translate the performance of networks that are not measured by Nielsen into an agency’s measurement parlance. What we did was to compare the delivery of a chosen network to a select affinity group of measured-by-Nielsen networks (such as Kids, Sports, Business and General Entertainment) in STB data and then apply this ratio to the actual Nielsen delivery for those same measured networks.

We examined a range of networks using Rentrak’s AT&T U-Verse data including Bloomberg, INSP, Sprout and Wealth. All these networks subscribed to Rentrak measurement. This does not include set top boxes in their Dish and other platforms. For the record, Rentrak reaches over 15 million tv sets. For the purposes of this analysis we used a subset which was the complete U-Verse universe of 2.5 million homes.

The following people were involved in discussions about the project at some point in its development: Joe Abruzzo (MPG), Brad Adgate (Horizon), Matthew Bayer (Carat), Shari Anne Brill (Independent), John Cogan (OMD), Ed DiNicola (Independent), Andy Donchin (Carat), Joan Fitzgerald (comScore), Frank Foster (AT&T U-Verse), Jason Kanefsky (MPG), Bill Livik (Rentrak), John Morse (Byron Media), Jim Multari (PBS Sprout), Mitch Oscar (MPG),
Stu Rodnick (Three Screen Nation), Art Salisch (Scarborough), Jonathan Steuer (AT&T U-Verse), Rick Wardell (INSP), Charlene Weisler (Independent) and Leslie Wood (Independent).


Sprout Example
In creating a ratio percentage for Sprout, we chose three Kids prototype networks that were measured by Nielsen and that best matched the Sprout profile. Using Rentrak AT&T U-Verse of 2.5 Million households for Primetime 8-11p we examined the following weeks: January 18-24, 2010, October 19-25, 2009, July 20-26, 2009 and April 20-26, 2009. We examined the same week per quarter to help ascertain seasonality.

Starting with January 18-24, 2010, we grossed and then averaged the audience delivery for the three prototype networks. Then we calculated Sprout’s percentage delivery of that average which was 9% for that January week.

Rentrak AT&T U-Verse Universe Impressions (Average Audience)
Cartoon 17,379 -
ABC Family 13,259 -
Nickelodeon 38,389 -
Total 69,027 (100%)
Average 23,009 -
Sprout 2,037 (9%)

We then examined Nielsen performance for the three prototype networks for the same week in January, grossed and averaged these deliveries and then applied the 4% ratio to the average. The result was 38,357 or Sprout.

Nielsen National Impressions (Average Audience)
Cartoon 382,521
ABC Family 680,379
Nickelodeon 215,683
Total 1,278,583
Average 426,194

Ratio % 9%
Sprout Average Audience 38,357

After calculating January, we wanted to be sure that the ratio was stable and not subject to seasonality. In applying the methodology to the other three quarters we found that the ratio percentage was comparable.

2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10
Sprout Ratio % 10% 8% 10% 9%


Conclusion
While the creation of performance ratios through Set Top Box Data is still in its developmental stages, the ratios created with prototypes using Rentrak’s AT&T U-Verse data has met with research and buyer sign-off as a plausible approach at agencies such as MPG and Carat. We hope to be able to examine more datasets over the next few months. This initial step indicates to us that the ratio method has the potential to create meaningful, comparable delivery impressions for certain networks in the television universe for use at the agencies.

Q&A Interview with Bruce Friend - OTX

Bruce Friend, President of IPSOS OTX Media Content and Technology, has had an illustrious career spanning over 30 years. And his background, often at start-ups, reflects the immense growth in the cable industry from its inception. Bruce started in the ad agency world but soon moved to pay cable for a new launch called HBO. He then moved to an new Hispanic broadcasting network called Telemundo and from there new basic cable networks MTV and Nickelodeon. Ultimately, Bruce make a strategic decision to move to the research supplier side of the business. In this fascinating interview Brice talks about a range of subjects including the new company formed from IPSOS’s acquisition of OTX, internet television, ethnography, research quality and some predictions for the next five years.

There are five videos in that cover the following topics:

Subject Length (in minutes)
Background (5:19)
Research Changes (6:54)
OTX and IPSOS (6:34)
Virtual Ethnography (6:54)
Future, Projects and Innovations (6:58)


Charlene Weisler interviews Bruce Friend, President IPSOS OTX, who discusses his extensive media background from agency to broadcast to cable to distributor to supplier in this 5:19 minute video:




Charlene Weisler interviews Bruce Friend who talks about changes in research and the importance of research quality. This video is 6:54 minutes long:
Research change and Quality




In this 6:34 minute video, Bruce talks about the merger of OTX into IPSOS:




Charlene Weisler interviews Bruce Friend who discusses the concept of Virtual Ethnography and how the use of new media can enhance research. This veido is 6:54 minutes long:




Bruce Friend talks about his future projects and media innovations and offers some predictions for the next five years in this final video (6:58 minutees long):