The world is getting more and more
complex but Dr. Robert Passikoff may have the solution. “Consumers
are more complex, connected, and complicated,” he noted, “They connect with
each other before even considering connecting to a brand and assess loyalty
relative to how they envision an ‘Ideal’ brand.” And, he continued, “Consumers don't
say what they think and they don't do what they say. Their decision-making is
more emotional than rational.”
So
understanding that consumers can make snap, emotional decisions, Passikoff has
developed Brand Keys which offers, among other studies, a syndicated annual
brand assessment survey called The Customer Loyalty Engagement Index (CLEI).
Charlene
Weisler: So the world of brand differentiation is much more emotional than
rational?
Robert
Passikoff: Yes and harder to attain in a more complex marketplace. Rational is
price-of-entry. It only takes a nanosecond for consumers to note how well a
brand is ‘seen’ to meet their expectations for the path-to-purchase drivers
that define behavior toward and fidelity to a brand. That’s the 21st century
version of brand loyalty. Brands that can meet consumer expectations will
always see higher levels of engagement, loyalty, and sales. Independent
validations by the ARF verify that definition. Correlations between assessments
based on this updated definition of loyalty, our metrics, and consumer behavior
are 0.80+. Social scientists would dance naked on their desks if they regularly
see correlations of half that!
Marketers who focus on so-called ‘loyalty programs’ expecting real
brand allegiance, are totally missing the point. There’s a need to measure
these emotions within a predictive framework. Measuring imagery doesn’t do
that, Counting tweets doesn’t do that. Net Promoter Scores don’t do that. But our
metrics measure emotions predictivly and they correlate with sales.
Charlene Weisler: Tell me about
your metrics.
Robert Passikoff: We
use an independently-validated research methodology that fuses emotional and
rational aspects of the categories, identifies four category-specific
path-to-purchase behavioral loyalty drivers for the category-specific Ideal and
identifies the values that form the components of each driver, along with their
percent-contribution to engagement, loyalty, and profitability. This technique,
a combination of psychological inquiry and statistical analyses, has a
test/re-test reliability of 0.93, and produces results generalizable at the 95%
confidence level. It has been successfully used in B2B, B2C, and D2C categories
in 35 countries. In 2020, CLEI Brand Keys merged independently validated
metrics with a new platform – Media GPS analytics – combining brand
communication consumption with emotional engagement. We contend that doing that
makes these loyalty assessments the most accurate in the marketing world.
Charlene Weisler: What was a
surprising result from one of your recent studies?
Robert Passikoff: Results showed that 85% for the loyalty
path-to-purchase drivers that describe how consumers view, compare, buy,
recommend, and remain loyal have changed their order. 85%! It’s a tectonic
shift in the marketing paradigm. Brands claim to be customer-centered, but if
you’re looking at the category in a different way than the consumers, you’re
bound to make mistakes. Additionally, new multidimensional emotional values
have appeared in 96% of the sectors we track. Those value components are the
bricks-and-mortar from which meaningful, differentiating, and engaging
marketing and communications are built.
Charlene Weisler: Tell me about
your syndicated study and what it offers.
Robert Passikoff: The
Customer Loyalty Engagement Index (CLEI) is a syndicated service that provides
a portion of the insights and learning available through a customized Brand
Keys study. We initiated CLEI in 1995. For the 2020 CLEI survey, 62,474
consumers, 16 to 65 years of age from the nine US Census Regions, self-selected
the categories in which they are consumers and the brands for which they are
customers. This year, Brand Keys examined 85 categories and 833 brands. Forty
(40%) percent were interviewed by phone, forty (40%) percent via face-to-face
interviews (to account for cell phone-only households), and twenty (20%) were
interviewed online.
Utilizing our proprietary psychological assessment
questionnaire respondents rate their “Ideal Brand” in the category, one brand
in the category that they personally use (usually a top-20% customer), and a
set of emotional and rational attributes, benefits, and values. Brand Keys uses
an independently-validated research methodology that fuses emotional and
rational aspects of the categories, identifies four category-specific
path-to-purchase behavioral loyalty drivers for the category-specific Ideal,
and identifies the values that form the components of each driver, along with
their percent-contribution to engagement, loyalty, and profitability.
Charlene
Weisler: In your opinion, what are
companies missing today?
Robert
Passikoff: They’re missing 21st
century context of loyalty in virtually everything they do. Companies,
analysts, consulting firms, and research practices have declared brand loyalty
dead. They're talking about a consumer loyalty model that expired in 1990. Back
then loyalty was a black-and-white issue for consumers. But loyalty has evolved
in a more complex marketplace with more sophisticated consumers. Better
targeting isn’t the answer. Entertainment isn’t the answer. Too many companies
mistake entertainment for real engagement. And yes, it is possible to target
all and be both entertaining AND engaging, but very few brands are capable of
doing that. Ad agencies have become media optimization labs and social
networking specialists. Social networking tactics have taken over brand
development. If you press corporations and researchers as to what the programs
are doing for the brand, the likely, first-response will be, “uhhhh."
Charlene Weisler: What are the
opportunities?
Robert Passikoff: The three critical opportunities for brands
are A) creating real emotional engagement between the consumer and the brand,
B) crafting differentiated meaning for your brand, and C) doing it
predictively, 1 to 18 months ahead of the competition. AND before they show up
on traditional brand trackers or are articulated in focus groups. Do it right
and you'll be able to more time and cost-efficiently market to your audiences.
This article first appeared in www.Mediapost.com
No comments:
Post a Comment