Showing posts with label Magid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Magid. Show all posts

Apr 4, 2019

The Future is Bright for eSports, According to the EAB

Image result for esportseSports competitive global gaming  is currently a multi-billion dollar industry with, as CNN reported, the potential to turn “casual gamers into serious stars who can sometimes rake in seven-figure earnings and massive brand endorsements.” The distribution channels of streaming services and live events have made it the next frontier for marketers who see it as an opportunity to advertise in fresh inventory and reach Millennial males. 

Notably, while not all games are eSports, all eSports are games and their burgeoning popularity is quickly making them a major player in the overall sports market.

The EAB (eSports Advertising Bureau) commissioned Magid to analyze the profile and proclivities of the eSports fan based on fusing and averaging the data of EAB members’ audience studies.

It was recently presented at the Secret Society meeting. Chris Pizzurro, Head of Sales and Marketing, Canoe Ventures who is on the EAB Advisory Board, presented the findings:
  • A majority (54%) of all U.S. consumers have heard of eSports which translates into 48 million people.
  • The majority of eSports fans are age 18-34 (58%), while 14% are 13-17 and 28% are 35+.
  • eSports fans skew male (71%), have a household income of $75k+ (49%), a college degree (60%) and are married (65%).
  • Compared to sports fans in general, eSports fans are heavier users of media.
For Pizzurro, one of the challenges with eSports measurement is that there is, “no central measurement. If a brand does a sponsorship deal with a media company and it includes broadcast, digital, social and arena, the measurement will come from each platform. So the media company, agency, or brands needs to put it all together.”

But the opportunities for advertisers, according to Pizzurro, are vast, from sponsoring a league or players to placements on distribution platforms. When asked, “Where do you see eSports in the media ecosystem three years from now?” he is optimistic, “It will be much more mature,” he stated,

“We have seen just in the last year much more business discipline from major media companies entering the space. We will see an increase in media spending from advertisers as the business execution lead time moves from months to weeks.”

This article was first published in Cynopsis.

Jan 4, 2018

ABC and Accenture Strategy Discover the Secret of Sales ROI



One of the more challenging aspects of advertising sales is calculating ROI. This is made even more complex with the proliferation of content platforms and consumer devices. What really contributed to Sales uplift? ABC, in addressing this issue, just released Phase 2 of an attribution analysis conducted by Accenture Strategy. Phase 2 is the follow-up to a custom study completed in 2016 and used four big data sources to prove the role and value of content in context in driving Sales ROI. 

Cindy Davis, Executive Vice President Consumer Experience, Disney ABC Television Group, took me through the study and how it contributes to their overall research strategy. “Our objective in this study is to measure what matters and there was industry pressure to measure ROI,” she stated. To that end, “we found a very interesting connection between engaged audiences and their content and the sales and ROI we can drive to clients who participate.”

To achieve that goal, Disney|ABC commissioned Accenture Strategy which, according to Davis, “had a robust database of marketing spend. This year in our Phase 2 of the study, we examined 26 national brands over six industries and their corresponding sales data representing $25 billion in marketing spend, with $11 billion in television spending.” 

Mike Chapman, Managing Director, Accenture Strategy, global lead for Media and Entertainment Strategy Practice added that his company provided three years of data, which provided a “closed loop view of advertising ROI – types of impressions delivered, how many, which channels, what prices were paid and the impacts from those impressions delivered on incremental sales week over week.”
In addition to Accenture’s marketing data, Davis asked Accenture Strategy to incorporate four other datasets in their recent study – Nielsen ratings, E-Poll, Nielsen Social and Magid’s Emotional DNA, which Davis described as, “intriguing because we are in the business of connecting with viewers emotionally and Magid’s DNA work speaks to that.” 

Phase 1 Takeaways
Davis and her team, focusing on the impact of multi-platform TV (premium long-form video across screens and devices) and how advertisers can leverage that impact, discovered three major takeaways from the Accenture Strategy 2016 study:

      1.       There is a halo effect on sales with multi-platform television. “This doesn’t get talked about a lot,” Davis noted, “You hear about last click attribution in digital advertising. But TV goes a long way to establish and amplify the impacts of all media.”

      2.       Multi-platform is under-valued, under attributed and under-represented in the industry. Eighteen percent of all of the ROI impact is traditionally attributed to digital but it should actually be attributed to multi-platform television. “Television has been traditionally undervalued and digital over-valued,” Davis concluded.

      3.       Multi-platform TV has a long-term amplification impact. The study compared sales lift over years and found that by year two or three, you no longer see a sales lift impact from digital. But the study proved that there is a long-term effect on sales lift with TV.

Phase 2 Takeaways - Drivers of ROI        
Davis highlighted three key drivers to ROI that were identified in the Phase 2 study. 

      1.       Audience size matters. “Higher-rated programs deliver more ROI than lower rated programs by 2X,” she stated, “so not all programs are created equal which makes sense.” And notably, these higher-rated programs deliver more ROI than their cost premium indicating that higher rated and therefore more expensive programming is worth the cost in greater sales lift ROI. This is because these programs have a greater footprint, greater social amplification and therefore have the ability to reach people beyond a narrowly defined target audience.

      2.       Consumers’ to commitment to the content matters.  “We looked at both the expressed and the observed commitment to the content,” Davis stated, “and found that the greater the effort to watch, the greater the ROI.” And there is 2X the ROI with Magid’s Intentionality measurement.
  
      3.       Content quality matters. Davis’ group examined perceived quality, as defined by the viewer, and quantified quality indicators using Magid’s emotional dimensions.  They found that the higher the perceived quality of the content, the greater the ROI. And, using Magid, the three most impactful dimensions for higher ROI were Smarts (programs that are informative, real and inspiring), Edge (unpredictable, outrageous and funny) and Relatability (originality, suspenseful and intelligent). “There is a direct connection between the emotions viewers feel about a show and the benefits advertisers gets in terms of greater ROI,” Davis concluded.

“We are already starting to have good conversations with clients as to what this means for them,” Davis stated. “It goes without saying that not all GRPs are created equal and now we can prove that. Yes, higher-rated shows command a premium but they deliver even greater ROI at that level.” Adding to all of this insight the impact of social connection and emotional dimensions, ABC is poised to help their clients take advantage of the best that multi-platform TV can offer.

This article first appeared in www.MediaVillage.com
 

May 29, 2015

Creative Research and Emotional DNA. Q&A with Mike Bloxham



Mike Bloxham might be best known in research circles for his work at Ball State University where his ethnographic study set the pace on ascertaining consumer device usage and adoption. Now, as SVP National Television and Video for Frank N. Magid Associates, Bloxham is working on a range of studies that incorporate both qualitative and quantitative applications across all video delivery platform initiatives.

In this fascinating interview, Bloxham talks about his current work with EmotionalDNA™, his past work at Ball State, the impact of smart TV, how cord cutting is actually cord morphing, measuring cross platform, the future of advertising and what will be the dominating media trend in the next few years.

There are five videos in the interview that can be viewed at www.weislermedia.blogspot.com:

Subject                                                                 length (minutes)
Background and Magid                                       7:30
Ball State                                                             9:46
Emotional DNA                                                   8:25
Predictions and Cord Morphing                         6:33
TV, Cross Platform, Mobile                               7:55



Charlene Weisler interviews Mike Bloxham who talks about his background and his work at Magid in this 7:30 minute video:



Mike Bloxham talks to Charlene Weisler about his work on ethnography at Ball State in this 9:46 minute video:




CW: What is EmotionalDNA™?

MB:  It’s effectively a viewer-derived portrait of prime time. It is based upon how TV viewers describe TV shows and TV networks as opposed to the way we in the industry define them. So it creates a different kind of taxonomy, a different lexicon for the way in which shows are defined by those viewers and it enables us to compare shows on a very different basis. We see that shows that are most like each other in the eyes of viewers aren’t necessarily shows which, on the surface, appear to be like each other.  So two unscripted shows based in Alaska might be very, very different in terms of emotional tonalities as far as the viewers are concerned. It may be that one of them is much more like sports programming or highly intense dramas, for example. In fact, that is true of one Alaska based unscripted show.

CW: Are you working with any networks on Emotional DNA?

MB: We have been working with A+E looking at EmotionalDNA™ as a means of defining emotional tonality of both programs and ads and understanding how ad receptivity can be impacted by the extent to which emotional tonality either matches or mismatches to varying degrees. And with other factors like the extent to which somebody likes a show is also a factor in improving ad receptivity. Which I can tell you it certainly is, looking at our data.



Charlene Weisler interviews Magid SVP Mike Bloxham about Emotional DNA. What is it? View this 8:25 minute video:


What could the media landscape look like in 3 - 5 years? Charlene Weisler asked Mike Bloxham who shared his Predictions and the concept of Cord Morphing in this 6:33 minute video:



CW: Mike, how do you think the media landscape will look five years from now?

MB: I am going to answer that question the way I have been answering it for the last ten years, which is simply to say “more”. There is going to be more complexity, more fragmentation, more functionality.  You will see more media with greater degrees of functionality. Television may finally cease to be the least sophisticated and most primitive screen available to us, albeit the granddaddy of them all in terms of reach and frequency. So I would just say “more” in pretty much any dimension you can think of. We are going to have more engagement with more compelling content because compelling content is what is going to enable businesses to survive.

CW: And what about the future of advertising?

MB: I think we are going to get smarter advertisers because the one thing I think is possibly going to change very significantly is the way in which brands reach people. And I don’t think it is anything as simplistic as what we call native advertising (which I am not a great fan of) but I do think that advertisers are going to realize as we see more time shifted viewing of one sort or another whether it is SVOD or DVR or VOD, I think there is going to be an overhaul in how we think about reaching people. Live TV is not going away. Thirty second spots are not going away. I don’t have that much patience for those who say they have gone away. Or for those who say TV is dead. But I do think there is going to be more creativity and inventive thinking in how brands engage with consumers both directly through what we conventionally define as media and the media of everyday experience off air, off line and out in people’s lives.   



In this final video, Mike Bloxham talks to Charlene Weisler about TV, Cross platform and Mobile in this 7:55 minute video: